Illustration of Retreat at Westlock from Harris County Housing Authority website
The Harris County Housing Authority (HCHA) has proposed a new development, Retreat at Westlock, that would offer 140 units for seniors aged 62 and older in Tomball, a suburb northwest of Houston. The apartments would be privately managed, serve seniors who earn less than 60 percent of the area’s median income and would not be funded through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. On July 30, the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs approved funding for the Retreat at Westlock from the state’s Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program.
(Note: As an LIHTC property, Retreat at Westlock would not be allowed to discriminate against Section 8 voucher holders, who could apply and be considered for housing. But the project is not funded using the Section 8 program.)
The idea of new housing for low income seniors has been met with virulent opposition by some members of the Tomball community, who created a petition on Change.org asking HCHA and county commissioner Jack Cagle to “shut down HUD funded HCHA Section 8 housing” and scrap plans for the development entirely.
In June, a confrontation between police and African-American teenagers at a pool in north Texas received national attention after a white resident reportedly admonished the teens to go back to their “Section 8 housing.” The incident highlighted racial tensions in the Dallas suburb of McKinney, where residents fought to keep low income housing out of the white side of town, and clearly demonstrated how “Section 8” has become a racial code word for some opponents of low income housing.
Compiled below are some selected comments from the Change.org page, articulating some residents’ reasons for opposing senior housing. 1,258 people have signed the petition as of this writing. Keep in mind that HCHA’s resident population is mostly African-American – 86 percent of applicants for housing in 2008 were black. It’s also worth pointing out that there is no association between housing vouchers and crime increases, and that even so, Retreat at Westlock is not a Section 8 development. Again, it would serve low income people 62 and up.
In their own, unedited words:
Warning: Explicit language
Dont want low income riff raff in my area
This will only bring thugs, drugs and crime into our area.
I don’t want my area to become “ghetto”
Just moved in this area to get away from the riff raff who wind up living in that type of housing and unfortunately they bring more crime into the area, and land values decrease…safety is diminished… Ask anyone who has lived in Spring TX… It USED to be a pleasant. safe area Not Anymore!!!!
Because I work and have worked hard all my life and have been given noting for free or discounted. I am tired of all the government handouts to lazy people. Free cell phones to homeless people and HUD/Goverment housing – tired of it all. I have had my vehicles broken into, due to being in close proximity and I moved where I moved to help stop that. I do not wish to have it in my backyard.
i feel like this housing development will bring an undesireable element of the cities population to our upstanding community. i fear for the safety of my family and friends if this housing development becomes a reality. i also feel that the surrounding property values will plummet due to the influx of criminal activity that i feel that this particular housing development will bring.
No low income housing.. It will change the face of not only Tomball but the surrounding area’s. Crime goes hand to hand with low income housing!
i don’t want criminal activity that sect. 8 housing brings to the area
I don’t want my area to unfortunately deteriorated because of the people that might moved into the apartments and we see this all the time over and over again we work so hard to have a decent neighborhood
Forced integration of Section 8 housing by the federal govt. providing grants to developers with taxpayer dollars who oppose these types or social community re-organization projects should not be allowed.
We moved away from Houston to get away from all the crime and now all these additions being made in Tomball is just bringing in more crime.
I disapprove of any HUD funding anywhere near this area. We moved out this way to get away from that type of atmosphere. I understand some want better but work hard like we did to get here.
I ‘m signing because with government funded apartments…comes government funded people that drains on my paycheck
You guys can go Fuck yourselves!!!!! Fuck you for trying to build this piece of shit community in my back yard destroying my property value and our schools!! Fuck you motherfuckin assholes!!!!
[…] must choose between the state’s responsibility to affirmatively further fair housing and the anti-low income housing biases of some of their constituents. And too often, representatives choose the latter. The prominence of representative points in the […]
[…] because “low-income” and “criminals” are not synonyms. To say otherwise – as some residents of the Houston suburbs did recently on an online petition against subsidized housing for seniors, calling low income residents […]
[…] is heavily influenced by the participation of state legislators, who in turn are influenced by bias against low income tenants in their districts. In this analysis Charlie explains how prejudice is, essentially, built into the […]
Comments are closed.