Texas cities lead nation in economic segregation

On the heels of a recent study that ranked Austin as the eighth most gentrifying city in the nation, a new report puts the Texas capital at the top of a related and equally ignoble list. Segregated City, a report by researchers at the Martin Prosperity Institute, names the Austin-Round Rock metro area as the most economically segregated in the United States. And the rest of the state isn’t far behind.

Three of the four most economically segregated large metro areas in the country are in Texas, the report finds: Austin-Round Rock first, San Antonio third and Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown fourth. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington places seventh, giving Texas four of the top ten. The state does not feature on the study’s corresponding list of the ten least economically segregated large metro areas.

The Martin Prosperity Institute determines economic segregation by looking at three interrelated types of segregation – income, education and occupation. More economically segregated cities have more defined divisions between areas with wealthy people and with lower-income people, between those with college and advanced degrees and those without, and between those who work in the “creative” field and those with “blue collar” jobs.

Several of the study’s findings illustrate what’s going on in the Austin area, and in Texas at large, that’s driving such drastic economic segregation.

Unsurprisingly, economic segregation is closely associated with income inequality. Texas, despite its high rates of economic growth over the past decade, is one of the least equal states in the country. A report last year found that Texas has the eighth most dramatic wealth gap in the United States, as in 2011, the top one percent of income earners took in more than 26 times as much as the remaining 99 percent. Houston, Dallas, Austin and El Paso all have higher rates of income inequality than the national average.

The Martin report also finds that economic segregation is “positively correlated with high-tech industry, the creative class share of the workforce, and the share of college grads.” In recent years Texas has seen some of the highest growth in the tech industry of any state in the nation, and as of 2012 was second only to California in total tech jobs. Texas cities have also seen large increases in their percentages of college graduates. Houston has had the largest increase in college grads of any American city – a 50 percent jump between 2000 and 2012, or double the average rate for a large city. Austin had the fourth highest rate over that time, at 44 percent.

Race plays an important role in economic segregation as well. Austin’s history of racial segregation is well-documented, and the city has lost some its African-American population over the past decade. But the metro area’s black population has grown, as higher housing costs force people toward the suburbs, while the area’s Hispanic population has skyrocketed, from less than 23 percent in 1990 to more than 35 percent today. The Austin area’s Asian population has more than doubled in that time. The Martin study finds that economic segregation is associated with higher shares of minority populations, while segregation is likely to be less pronounced in whiter cities. In San Antonio, a majority Hispanic metro area, the non-white population has grown at more than twice the rate of the white population since 2010. Houston became the most racially diverse metro area in the nation in 2010, as the white population has decreased by almost 20 percent since 1990 while Hispanics now make up more than a third of the area.

Increased minority populations, increased overall economic growth and increased white collar jobs have only made economic segregation in Texas more stark. While the state still boasts about the so-called “Texas miracle,” the Martin report is an important reminder of the flip side of the equation. Texas is now a national leader in economic segregation.


  1. […] Austin is the most economically segregated city in the country. It is a city with a deep and enduring legacy of racial segregation, where it’s still immensely difficult for a voucher holder to find housing in an integrated, high opportunity neighborhood. Source of income protection is a step toward fixing that problem. AAA’s position does the opposite – it further entrenches the kind of racial concentrations that already exist around most of the properties the association’s board members own and manage. It furthers discrimination, and perpetuates a racially segregated status quo that has existed in Austin for far too long. […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: